For me, friendship is based on trust, and not even have to be mutual, which is like saying "no need my friend is my friend to be your friend" and in my case, I think it is so. If I have trusted you, if I feel sympathy, friendship, for you, when you have a failure or do something that I did not like it, you'll know, because if things do not bother you or commitment, and there is something wrong, failure the confidence to say what I feel. I think understanding this is my concept of friendship means so easy, I need you to have the same trust me with you I do not need to be "amiwitos" of the soul, I can be your friend Like you do not share that sentiment, but Igive a damn, so basically, I have a senimiento to you, that you have to me, yours is a personal thing, save it and do with what you think appropriate. This does not mean that if I have not even fought with you I'm not your friend, I can having fought with you and caring about your life sucks, or I can not ever cross me you and be a very important person for me, a close, a person that is reluctant to embrace me, those things. What matters is what I feel. Now
explanatory note, this is a personal reflection written to an imaginary person, the reader should not take the hint at no time since I am not directing my XDDpensamients anyone
The solution to the problem planteade before, is the second and third choice, they are friends, the first no, because doing things for commitment, not a sign of confidence, and therefore, not friendship.
